<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quality Video Always</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wellcomemat.com/2009/01/quality-video-always/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wellcomemat.com/2009/01/quality-video-always/</link>
	<description>Real Estate Video from the Front Lines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:38:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Stewart Downtown Vancouver Real Estate Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.wellcomemat.com/2009/01/quality-video-always/comment-page-1/#comment-5486</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Stewart Downtown Vancouver Real Estate Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatevideo.wellcomemat.com/?p=419#comment-5486</guid>
		<description>My only concern with HD is that it will be too good. Alot of what I shoot is my face and I have been told that for TV presenters they have to spend a lot longer in make up. Am I being silly to have these concerns?

Thanks!

PS I will probably go with the Flip camera, I hate too many features and only do one long take. No editing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only concern with HD is that it will be too good. Alot of what I shoot is my face and I have been told that for TV presenters they have to spend a lot longer in make up. Am I being silly to have these concerns?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>PS I will probably go with the Flip camera, I hate too many features and only do one long take. No editing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WellcomeMat</title>
		<link>http://blog.wellcomemat.com/2009/01/quality-video-always/comment-page-1/#comment-5484</link>
		<dc:creator>WellcomeMat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatevideo.wellcomemat.com/?p=419#comment-5484</guid>
		<description>Good question(s) and we definitely think about this a lot. Flip does one thing really well: ease of use. Canon and Sony are pushing out the best cameras, but again, Flip has them beat on the ease of use front.

If the goal is quick, then Flip the way. If the goal is to progress on the video quality and editing front, then go Sony or Canon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question(s) and we definitely think about this a lot. Flip does one thing really well: ease of use. Canon and Sony are pushing out the best cameras, but again, Flip has them beat on the ease of use front.</p>
<p>If the goal is quick, then Flip the way. If the goal is to progress on the video quality and editing front, then go Sony or Canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Stewart Downtown Vancouver Realtor</title>
		<link>http://blog.wellcomemat.com/2009/01/quality-video-always/comment-page-1/#comment-5483</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Stewart Downtown Vancouver Realtor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realestatevideo.wellcomemat.com/?p=419#comment-5483</guid>
		<description>What are your thoughts on the new Flip HD camera? I use the regular Flip for my video blog and it works great for what I do, but I&#039;d love to go HD.

Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your thoughts on the new Flip HD camera? I use the regular Flip for my video blog and it works great for what I do, but I&#8217;d love to go HD.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
