WellcomeMat vs YouTube

Without question, the most common question that WellcomeMat’s team gets is “how does WellcomeMat compare with YouTube?” The easy answer is to say that we don’t compare at all. The slightly longer answer is that WellcomeMat is for people and companies that consider themselves video publishers.  

Video publishers are focused on integrating a branded video experience on their site and building an audience of viewers. This is why you don’t see CNN or ESPN using  relying on YouTube as their primary means to reach their audience. Publishers want viewers on their site or blog, where they have control over what happens before, during and after someone watches their video(s).

If building an audience or gaining new leads is what you are into, YouTube could not be any more wrong…

Many times we hear people say, “I post videos on YouTube because that’s where consumers are,” or “I want to make sure that my videos are found/viewed as many times as possible.”

Because WellcomeMat has been doing this real estate video thing for as long as we have, we can-and are about to-disprove all of the above.

Publishers don’t get much traffic to their site using YouTube. We wrote an extensive blog post, YouTube – The Opposite Effect of Google should you want to really dive into this particular subject. But, in the spirit of progress, let’s move on and discuss the, “I want to make sure that my videos are found/viewed as many times as possible,” statement.

A few weeks ago, I had this tweet forwarded to me by a buddy:

Screen_shot_2010-10-25_at_8

First, we must congratulate Coldwell Banker for a) devoting the amount of resources that they are in order to dive into video more than any other international real estate brand, and b) reaching 1.6MM visits to their channel. WellcomeMat’s team really does appreciate the leap of faith that they took.

At the time that the above tweet made its way into CB’s social media marketing stream, On Location’s stats looked exactly like this:

Screen_shot_2010-09-13_at_9

Total views – 598,778

Wow…great amount of views! Naturally, we wanted to see how our platform stacked up against the most aggressive video push in the history of the real estate industry…

Halstead Properties in NYC-a brokerage with 650 agents-gathered 241,112 views On Their Website (not on YouTube). Without any advertising, without the muscle of a national marketing campaign, and without spending millions of dollars on content creation, Halstead’s view count was 40.26% of Coldwell Banker’s. Perhaps even more telling, Halstead generated these views with only 445 videos vs Coldwell Banker’s 1100 plus. One could imagine these stats being a lot more close with an equal amount of content.

Halstead’s numbers were achieved – organically – using WellcomeMat’s platform, without any crazy blackhat techniques. Just the video basics being applied by the most real-estate-video-obsessed team in the industry.

Add in the views that Halstead gathered via WellcomeMat’s automated distribution and they had damn near 70% of the views that Coldwell Banker had. Not bad for a couple small teams with some heart. 

- – - 

+ For More Information About the Value that WellcomeMat Will Bring to your Brokerage or Brand, click here.

+ For More Info About WellcomeMat Pro (for individual real estate professionals and the video pros that serve them), click here.

 

What do you think?

  • Andrew Mooers

    If youtube is the second largest search engine, if youtube is the 800 pound gorilla and social media giant for the video platform, maybe more than one video distribution makes sense. In marketing you want reach, frequency. And like in hockey, there are no ugly goals. Have over 405,000 views from our little Maine real estate operation way up here in the right hand corner of the word. http://www.youtube.com/mooersrealty 445 videos that really deliver property, community, brand information quick and easy.

  • WellcomeMat Video

    Andrew…you are right in a lot of ways. The problem with YouTube is that, while it is a great place to find videos, it is not a “search engine.” In a traditional sense, search engines should be sending traffic to publishers’ websites. Additionally, we think the argument could be made that YouTube does not represent an ideal place for views to occur because it’s not set up to create phone/email connections between parties.WellcomeMat offers automated distribution to YouTube via our platform, but we are distributing videos to YouTube, Facebook, Facebook Fan Pages, Twitter etc. in a way that is most likely to position our users’ and partners’ sites as the source of video content (the place where the videos originated).Our goal here is not to say that people should not distribute videos to YouTube (although there is a case to be made against it). What we are saying is that:1) People spend a lot of time and money creating video content2) Views should ideally occur on our users’ and partners’ sites because they usually represent the best shot at making a personal connection with viewers. 3) For brands, every view should be an extension of your brand. Search for one of your videos on YouTube. Search results don’t even land viewers within your branded channel.Love the hockey analogy…very happy to hear your point of view and thanks for taking the time to comment!

  • EmmanuelFonte

    If there is something I know for sure, is that there is more than one right answer. To dismiss YouTube is a mistake in my opinion. In my region (Seattle’s Eastside) where Microsoft and Nintendo live, all of my listings have their own domain. Five months ago, I switched the riders to include facebook and YouTube icons. The web traffic skyrocketed. Those brands are stronger than any real estate company or video hosting service. Around here, the consumer is very comfortable with YouTube, why would I not engage them there? BTW: Andrew is right. All that matters is scoring that goal and winning!

  • WellcomeMat Video

    Emmanuel…you are right and I think we might be mis-communicating. We are not “dismissing” YouTube – we are saying that real estate professionals and brands can engage people with their video content on YouTube via our platform, but they can do it while positioning themselves in a much better/smarter way long-term.In short, YouTube is not a platform for publishers (ie…people and companies looking to build an audience on their turf) – it is merely one place where views can be gathered. The argument we are making is that real estate video views will produce better results within the right context.

  • chadvanags

    This is why you don’t see CNN or ESPN using YouTube.

  • chadvanags

    Don’t know what happened to my post but, basically, I’m confused as to why you said this: This is why you don’t see CNN or ESPN using YouTube. ESPN and CNN joined YouTube in October of 2005. http://www.YouTube.com/ESPN and http://www.YouTube.com/CNN.

  • WellcomeMat Video

    Chad, we’re trying to post a comment here a having the same difficulties w/ Posterous. Stand by…

  • Phil Thomas Di Giulio

    Chad,Thanks for making that (valid) point! We’ve updated the post with the following statement:”This is why you don’t see CNN or ESPN relying on YouTube as their primary means to reach their audience.”Based on your comments, and earlier ones, we obviously missed in making our point, which is that YouTube should be leveraged, but not relied upon as a primary video delivery vehicle. If you look at ESPN and CNN’s YouTube channels, you’ll see that their first/last posts were on August, 2010 and December 17th respectively. They are publishing content, indexing that content on their sites with search engines, and only then distributing videos (selectively and on a lag) into YouTube. YouTube is great in a lot of ways, but helping people and companies to build an audience on their sites is not one of them. We wrote another post on this if you are interested:http://blog.wellcomemat.com/youtube-the-opposite-effect-of-google-1Thanks again for your comments! They are valid and we appreciate having the dialogue.

  • Christian Sterner

    Chad…you might additionally want to check out this TechCrunch post about where video traffic to publisher sites is coming from. This article explains a lot about the goals of people and companies that are spending a lot of quality time and money on their video content and where success is being captured. Of note is that WellcomeMat's platform performs every function mentioned in this article for our partners and customers: http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/23/facebook-second-largest-source-videos/ Take Care and Happy New Year. 

  • RobR

    It feels like a bit of head in sand talking from Welcome mat – either that or you just aren’t explaining your USP well. I still don’t quite know what you guys do. But I definitely can’t agree with the CNN analogy or that there would be any reason to avoid youtube. Firstly, youtube is going to do to CNN what CNN did to ABC/NBC/CBS news. So when CNN sticks their head in the sand by not figuring out how to use youtube, that just means they’re business is going to get hurt badly. Welcome mat- I see nice stuff on your site – i’m a real estate agent – and i still don’t get you. Do you do the video’s, or do you host them, or do you what? Either way, i think you need to figure out how to use your service along side youtube rather than stick your head in the sand. I used to work for a tech publisher who now essentially out of business. they dominated their industry – and i mean dominated. Then the internet came along and they refused to put their content on the web….. by the time they did it was too late. When Fred goes grocery shopping and meets the annoying orange and gets 15 million views in 6 months – the idea that 650 agents with 400+ videos only got a 200,000+ views on their website doesn’t wow me. before i sign off – what i see that works on welcome mat is brokerages who have built a brand image. If that’s what you’re saying, fine. But CNN will eventually go out of business or be running a biz a fraction of their size now if they don’t embrace youtube. we agents don’t have to worry about that yet – instead, one or some of us is going to make a killing if we can just figure out how to use it properly. JMHO

  • WellcomeMat Video

    Rob,Your idea– “i think you need to figure out how to use your service along side youtube”–is a good one and has been available via our platform for almost 2 years. In addition to automated distribution to YouTube, we enable our partners and customers to distribute content to Facebook + Facebook Fan Pages + Twitter + Craigslist + Into Their Branded Video Experience on Their Sites. We provide MLS compliant video players (which YouTube’s player is not), fulfillment with real estate videographers, yard sign tour links and reporting on how your videos are performing via all of the above. We also index our users’ and partners’ video content on their site so that the search engine traffic that results lands on their sites.Is that a head in sand approach? I definitely apologize if you looked at pages such as our WellcomeMat Pro Tour ( http://www.wellcomemat.com/explore/pro/ ) and came away without an idea for what we do for agents. If that’s the case, then we clearly have work to do in demonstrating our value to site visitors and I (Christian Sterner – Co-founder of WellcomeMat) take responsibility for that. But, I’d urge you to search for anything related to real estate in your area via YouTube. Find what you are looking for or did you find that experience to be a bit more than you bargained for?All of your opinions are good. You are right that people and companies that dig their heads in the sand vs embracing technology trends will have a painful future. But, in regards to real estate video, context is everything. A view on YouTube is not worth as much as a view on a site where more real estate information (and phone/email connections) can be made.

  • http://activerain.com/blogsview/2630244/making-real-estate-videos-that-someone-needs-wants-to-watch- Andrew Mooers

    Regardless of the video platforms you use, you need to make interesting, helpful, worthwhile to watch and listen to videos! That is something we can all agree with right?